Jacquelyn Carlson v. Christian Brother Service
| JACQUELYN M. CARLSON |
| CHRISTIAN BROTHER SERVICES |
| 15-3807 |
| December 18, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Americans w/Disabilities Act-Empl |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Carlson v. Christian Brothers Services
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
702870940
Filed opinion of the court by Judge Posner. AFFIRMED. Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge; Joel M. Flaum, Circuit Judge and Daniel A. Manion, Circuit Judge. [6793303-1] [6793303] [15-3807]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Jacquelyn Carlson v. Christian Brother Service | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: JACQUELYN M. CARLSON | |
| Represented By: | Barry A. Gomberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: CHRISTIAN BROTHER SERVICES | |
| Represented By: | Kathryn Montgomery Moran |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
