Advocate Health Care Network, et al v. Maria Stapelton, et al
Petitioner: ADVOCATE HEALTH CARE NETWORK, An Illinois Non-profit Corporation, KEVIN R. BRADY, an individual, BENEFIT PLAN ADMINISTRTIVE COMMITTEE FOR THE CHURCH PLANS OF ADVOCATE HEALTH CARE NETWORK and COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ADVOCATE HEALTH CARE NETWORK
Respondent: MARIA STAPELTON, JUDITH LUKAS, SHARON ROBERTS and ANTOINE FOX, behalf of themselves, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, on behalf of Advocate Plan
Case Number: 15-8003
Filed: January 23, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Advocate Health Care Network, et al v. Maria Stapelton, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ADVOCATE HEALTH CARE NETWORK, An Illinois Non-profit Corporation
Represented By: David B. Goodman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: KEVIN R. BRADY, an individual
Represented By: David B. Goodman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: BENEFIT PLAN ADMINISTRTIVE COMMITTEE FOR THE CHURCH PLANS OF ADVOCATE HEALTH CARE NETWORK
Represented By: David B. Goodman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ADVOCATE HEALTH CARE NETWORK
Represented By: David B. Goodman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MARIA STAPELTON
Represented By: James B. Zouras
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: JUDITH LUKAS
Represented By: James B. Zouras
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SHARON ROBERTS
Represented By: James B. Zouras
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ANTOINE FOX, behalf of themselves, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, on behalf of Advocate Plan
Represented By: James B. Zouras
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?