Marlon Thomas v. WGN New
| MARLON THOMAS |
| WGN NEWS |
| 16-1025 |
| January 5, 2016 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
702718171
Filed Nonprecedential Disposition PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Thomas is ordered to show cause why he should not be sanctioned for pursuing this frivolous appeal. See FED. R. APP. P. 38; In re City of Chicago, 500 F.3d 582, 585-86 (7th Cir. 2007); Support Systems International, Inc. v. Mack, 45 F.3d 185, 186 87 (7th Cir. 1995). His response is due within 14 days from the date of this decision. Diane P. Wood, Chief Judge; Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge and Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge. [6735008-1] [6735008] [16-1025]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Marlon Thomas v. WGN New | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: MARLON THOMAS | |
| Represented By: | Marlon Thomas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: WGN NEWS | |
| Represented By: | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.