Otganbaatar Tsegmed v. Loretta Lynch
Petitioner: OTGANBAATAR TSEGMED
Respondent: LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General of the United States
Case Number: 16-1036
Filed: January 6, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 15, 2017 Summary Otgonbaatar Tsegmed v. Jefferson B. Sessions III

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 703014743 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Wood. The Petition for Review is DENIED. Diane P. Wood, Chief Judge; Joel M. Flaum, Circuit Judge and William M. Conley, District Court Judge. [6848048-1] [6848048] [16-1036]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Otganbaatar Tsegmed v. Loretta Lynch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: OTGANBAATAR TSEGMED
Represented By: Isuf Kola
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General of the United States
Represented By: OIL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?