USA v. Raul Palacios-De Paz
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
RAUL PALACIOS-DE PAZ, also known as Raul Palacios, also known as Bulmaro Palacios-De Paz, also known as Luis Roman |
16-1080 |
January 14, 2016 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 702807228 Filed Nonprecedential Disposition PER CURIAM. Counsel s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. Palacios De Paz s motion for appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED. Diane P. Wood, Chief Judge; Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge and David F. Hamilton, Circuit Judge. [6741311-2] [6754911-2] [6769644-1] [6769644] [16-1080] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Raul Palacios-De Paz | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Jeffrey D. Preston |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellant: RAUL PALACIOS-DE PAZ, also known as Raul Palacios, also known as Bulmaro Palacios-De Paz, also known as Luis Roman | |
Represented By: | Gwendolyn M. Beitz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.