Ronald Sweatt v. Union Pacific Railroad Compan
Plaintiff - Appellant: RONALD SWEATT
Defendant - Appellee: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Case Number: 16-1236
Filed: February 5, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Railway Labor Act

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 6, 2017 Ronald Sweatt v. Union Pacific Railroad Compan

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 702948850 Filed Nonprecedential Disposition PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. William J. Bauer, Circuit Judge; Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge and Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge. [6823243-1] [6823243] [16-1236]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ronald Sweatt v. Union Pacific Railroad Compan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: RONALD SWEATT
Represented By: John S. Bishof
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Represented By: Brody E. Dawson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?