Shirley Thomas v. Carolyn Colvin
Plaintiff - Appellant: SHIRLEY A. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee: CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 16-2006
Filed: May 2, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: R.S.I.

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 13, 2017 Shirley Thomas v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 702936943 Filed Nonprecedential Disposition PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge; Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge and Diane S. Sykes, Circuit Judge. [6818608-1] [6818608] [16-2006]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Shirley Thomas v. Carolyn Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: SHIRLEY A. THOMAS
Represented By: Shirley A. Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: James M. Kuhn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?