Dustan Dobbs v. George McLaughlin
Defendant: DEPUY ORTHOPEDICS, INCORPORATED, DEPUY, INCORPORATED, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL
Plaintiff - Appellant: DUSTAN DOBBS
Appellee: GEORGE E. MCLAUGHLIN, on behalf of JOHN GEHLHAUSEN, P.C., on behalf of ANTHONY G. ARGEROS, P.C.
Case Number: 16-2135
Filed: May 16, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 1, 2016 Summary Dobbs v. McLaughlin

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 702892183 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Kanne. The court VACATES the district court s award of attorneys fees and REMANDS the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Joel M. Flaum, Circuit Judge; Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge and Jane E. Magnus-Stinson, District Court Judge. [6801422-1] [6801422] [16-2135]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Dustan Dobbs v. George McLaughlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: DUSTAN DOBBS
Represented By: Edward X. Clinton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DEPUY ORTHOPEDICS, INCORPORATED
Represented By: Susan M. Sharko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DEPUY, INCORPORATED
Represented By: Susan M. Sharko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Represented By: Susan M. Sharko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES, INC.
Represented By: Susan M. Sharko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL
Represented By: Susan M. Sharko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: GEORGE E. MCLAUGHLIN, on behalf of JOHN GEHLHAUSEN, P.C., on behalf of ANTHONY G. ARGEROS, P.C.
Represented By: George E. McLaughlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?