Brendan Dassey v. Michael Dittmann
BRENDAN DASSEY |
MICHAEL A. DITTMANN |
16-3397 |
September 9, 2016 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Dassey v. Dittmann |
Brendan Dassey v. Michael Dittmann |
Dassey v. Dittmann |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 703123956 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Hamilton. Given the state courts reasonable findings of fact and the absence of clearly established Supreme Court precedent that compels relief for Dassey, the district court s grant of habeas relief is REVERSED. The case is REMANDED to the district court with instructions to dismiss the petition. Diane P. Wood, Chief Judge; dissenting; Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge; Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge; Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge, dissenting; Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge; Diane S. Sykes, Circuit Judge and David F. Hamilton, Circuit Judge. (Wood, Chief Judge, with whom Rovner and Williams, Circuit Judges, join dissenting) (Rovner, Circuit Judge, with whom Wood, Chief Judge, and Williams, Circuit Judge, join dissenting) (Circuit Judges Flaum and Barrett did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.) [6889039-1] [6889039] [16-3397] |
Filing 703019014 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Rovner. The decision of the district court is AFFIRMED in all respects. The writ of habeas corpus is GRANTED unless the State of Wisconsin elects to retry Dassey within 90 days of issuance of this court s final mandate, or of the Supreme Court s final mandate. Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge; Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge and David F. Hamilton, Circuit Judge, dissenting. [6849593-1] [6849593] [16-3397] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.