Dustin King v. Marion County Circuit Court
DUSTIN A. KING |
MARION COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT |
16-3726 |
October 21, 2016 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Americans w/Disabilities Act-Othr |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
King v. Marion County Circuit Court |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 703054448 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Easterbrook. The judgment of the district court is reversed, and the case is remanded with instructions to dismiss without prejudice to raising a Title II claim in state court. Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge; Daniel A. Manion, Circuit Judge and David F. Hamilton, Circuit Judge. [6862762-1] [6862762] [16-3726] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Dustin King v. Marion County Circuit Court | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellee: DUSTIN A. KING | |
Represented By: | Andrea L. Ciobanu |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellant: MARION COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT | |
Represented By: | Philip A. Gordon |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.