Masco Corporation v. Peter Prostyakov
MASCO CORPORATION |
PETER A. PROSTYAKOV |
16-3803 |
October 28, 2016 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Ovrpmnts & Enforcement of Judgments |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Masco Corporation v. Peter Prostyakov |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 702982120 Filed Nonprecedential Disposition PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Because this appeal is frivolous, we give Prostyakov 14 days to show cause why we should not impose a sanction of $5,000. Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge and Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7016 0340 0001 1335 2343. [6835601-1] [6835601] [16-3803] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Masco Corporation v. Peter Prostyakov | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellee: MASCO CORPORATION | |
Represented By: | John K. Henning |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellant: PETER A. PROSTYAKOV | |
Represented By: | Peter A. Prostyakov |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.