Higher Society of Indiana v. Tippecanoe County, Indiana
HIGHER SOCIETY OF INDIANA |
TIPPECANOE COUNTY, INDIANA |
17-1089 |
January 13, 2017 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Higher Society of Indiana v. Tippecanoe County |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 703010234 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Manion. The district court's well reasoned opinion is AFFIRMED. Daniel A. Manion, Circuit Judge; Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge and Sharon Johnson Coleman, District Court Judge. [6846350-1] [6846350] [17-1089] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Higher Society of Indiana v. Tippecanoe County, Indiana | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellee: HIGHER SOCIETY OF INDIANA | |
Represented By: | Jan Peter Kubicki-Mensz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellant: TIPPECANOE COUNTY, INDIANA | |
Represented By: | Douglas J. Masson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.