Dale Kleber v. CareFusion Corporation

Dale Kleber v. CareFusion Corporation

Plaintiff - Appellant:	DALE E. KLEBER
Defendant - Appellee:	CAREFUSION CORPORATION
Case Number:	17-1206
Filed:	February 1, 2017
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Jobs

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed	Description
April 26, 2018	Kleber v. CareFusion Corp.
January 23, 2019	Kleber v. CareFusion Corp.

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 26, 2018	Filing 703206924 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Hamilton. The judgment of the district court is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Because this opinion could be seen as creating a conflict among the circuits, despite Smith, 544 U.S. at 237 n.8 (citing with approval earlier circuit cases allowing disparate impact claims by job applicants), it was circulated before release to all judges in active service under Circuit Rule 40(e). A majority of judges in active service did not favor rehearing en banc. Judges Flaum, Kanne, Sykes, and Barrett voted in favor of rehearing en banc. William J. Bauer, Circuit Judge, dissenting, David F. Hamilton, Circuit Judge and Sara Darrow, District Court Judge. [6920771-1] [6920771] [17-1206]

Date Filed

Document Text

April 26, 2018

Filing 703206924 Filed opinion of the court by Judge Hamilton. The judgment of the district court is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Because this opinion could be seen as creating a conflict among the circuits, despite Smith, 544 U.S. at 237 n.8 (citing with approval earlier circuit cases allowing disparate impact claims by job applicants), it was circulated before release to all judges in active service under Circuit Rule 40(e). A majority of judges in active service did not favor rehearing en banc. Judges Flaum, Kanne, Sykes, and Barrett voted in favor of rehearing en banc. William J. Bauer, Circuit Judge, dissenting, David F. Hamilton, Circuit Judge and Sara Darrow, District Court Judge. [6920771-1] [6920771] [17-1206]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Dale Kleber v. CareFusion Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: DALE E. KLEBER
Represented By:	Daniel B. Kohrman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: CAREFUSION CORPORATION
Represented By:	Tobias E. Schlueter
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?