Christopher Washington v. Mark Sevier
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER E. WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee: MARK R. SEVIER, Superintendent
Case Number: 17-1612
Filed: March 22, 2017
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 2, 2018 Christopher Washington v. Mark Sevier

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 703191400 Filed Nonprecedential Disposition PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Kenneth F. Ripple, Circuit Judge; Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge and Amy C. Barrett, Circuit Judge. [6914753-1] [6914753] [17-1612]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Christopher Washington v. Mark Sevier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: CHRISTOPHER E. WASHINGTON
Represented By: Christopher E. Washington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: MARK R. SEVIER, Superintendent
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?