Michael Platt v. Dorothy Brown, et al
| MICHAEL PLATT |
| DOROTHY BROWN, as Clerk of the Circuit Court of Cook County and MARIA PAPPAS, as Treasurer of the Cook County Treasurer's Office |
| 17-1830 |
| April 20, 2017 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Michael Platt v. Dorothy Brown, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: MICHAEL PLATT | |
| Represented By: | Todd L. McLawhorn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: DOROTHY BROWN, as Clerk of the Circuit Court of Cook County | |
| Represented By: | Jill V. Ferrara |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: MARIA PAPPAS, as Treasurer of the Cook County Treasurer's Office | |
| Represented By: | Jill V. Ferrara |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
