Miller UK, Ltd., et al v. Caterpillar Inc.
Defendant / Appellee: CATERPILLAR INC., a Delaware corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant: MILLER UK, LTD., a United Kingdom private limited company and MILLER INTERNATIONAL LTD., a Gibraltar private limited company
Case Number: 17-2130
Filed: May 30, 2017
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER re: Joint motion for voluntary dismissal. This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to F.R.A.P. 42(b). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [ # 6 ][7][6866908] [17-1890, 17-2015, 17-2059, 17-2130] (ER) [Entered: 09/06/2017 02:27 PM]
September 6, 2017 Filing 6 Joint motion filed by Appellant Caterpillar Inc. and Appellees Miller International Ltd. and Miller UK, Ltd. in 17-1890, Appellants Miller International Ltd., Miller UK, Ltd. and Appellee Caterpillar Inc. in 17-2015, 17-2059, 17-2130 to dismiss case. [6] [6866867] [17-1890, 17-2015, 17-2059, 17-2130] (Joshi, Sopan) [Entered: 09/06/2017 01:26 PM]
September 6, 2017 FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 09/06/2017 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [6866948-2] [6866948] [17-1890, 17-2015, 17-2059, 17-2130] (ER) [Entered: 09/06/2017 03:14 PM]
August 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, all proceedings in this appeal are STAYED pending further court order. Counsel for the Appellees/Cross-Appellants are directed to make a telephonic status report to the Circuit Mediation Office 08/31/2017. This requirement may be satisfied by filing a motion under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) to dismiss the appeal. JNS [6862055] [17-1890, 17-2015, 17-2059, 17-2130] (MM) [Entered: 08/16/2017 03:39 PM]
July 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing will proceed as follows: Main appeal brief due on or before 09/18/2017 for Caterpillar Inc. Appellee Cross-Appellant brief due on or before 10/18/2017 for Miller International Ltd. and Miller UK, Ltd. Appellant Reply Cross-Appellee brief due by 11/17/2017 for Appellant Caterpillar Inc.. Reply Brief in Cross Appeal due by 12/05/2017 for Appellants Miller International Ltd. and Miller UK, Ltd. JNS [6856961] [17-1890, 17-2015, 17-2059, 17-2130] (MM) [Entered: 07/27/2017 09:51 AM]
June 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: The court, on its own motion, orders that these appeals are CONSOLIDATED for purposes of briefing and disposition. The briefing schedule is as follows: Defendant Caterpillar, Inc. shall file its opening brief and required short appendix in the main appeals docketed in 17-1890 and 17-2059 on or before August 28, 2017. Plaintiffs Miller UK, Ltd. and Miller International Ltd. shall file their combined responsive brief in the main appeals and opening brief and appendix in the cross-appeals docketed in 17-2015 and 17-2130 on or before September 28, 2017. Defendant Caterpillar, Inc. shall file its combined reply brief, if any, in the main appeals and responsive brief in the cross-appeals on or before October 30, 2017. Plaintiffs Miller UK, Ltd. and Miller International Ltd. shall file their reply brief, if any, in the cross-appeals on or before November 13, 2017. DW [3] [6845211] [17-1890, 17-2015, 17-2059, 17-2130] (AP) [Entered: 06/02/2017 09:07 AM]
June 1, 2017 Filing 2 Notice of Circuit Rule 33 mediation issued. The mediation will be conducted by phone, Wednesday, July 26, 2017 at 9:30 a.m. Central Time. See Notice for further details and requirements. JNS. [2] [6845045] [17-2130] (FP) [Entered: 06/01/2017 01:50 PM]
May 30, 2017 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing Statement filed. Docketing Statement due for Appellants Miller International Ltd. and Miller UK, Ltd. by 06/06/2017. Transcript information sheet due by 06/13/2017. Appellant's brief due on or before 07/10/2017 for Miller International Ltd. and Miller UK, Ltd. [1] [6844445] [17-2130]--[Text updated 06/02/2017 by JR to reflect that the docketing statement was initially included in the short record.] (ER) [Entered: 05/30/2017 04:18 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Miller UK, Ltd., et al v. Caterpillar Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CATERPILLAR INC., a Delaware corporation
Represented By: Robert N. Hochman
Represented By: Nathaniel C. Love
Represented By: Constantine L. Trela Jr.
Represented By: Gregory L. Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: MILLER UK, LTD., a United Kingdom private limited company
Represented By: Sopan Joshi
Represented By: Reed S. Oslan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: MILLER INTERNATIONAL LTD., a Gibraltar private limited company
Represented By: Sopan Joshi
Represented By: Reed S. Oslan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?