Roland Parker v. USA
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROLAND J. PARKER
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 17-2575
Filed: August 3, 2017
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Medical Malpractice

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 4, 2018 Roland Parker v. USA

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 703212219 Filed Nonprecedential Disposition PER CURIAM. The judgment is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this order. Joel M. Flaum, Circuit Judge; Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge and Amy C. Barrett, Circuit Judge. [6922734-1] [6922734] [17-2575]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Roland Parker v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: ROLAND J. PARKER
Represented By: Roland J. Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Jonathan C. Haile
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?