Jennifer DiPerna v. Chicago School of Professional
| JENNIFER DIPERNA |
| CHICAGO SCHOOL OF PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY |
| 17-3351 |
| November 15, 2017 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 DiPerna v. Chicago School of Professional Psychology
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
703241006
Filed opinion of the court by Judge Manion. AFFIRMED. Kenneth F. Ripple, Circuit Judge; Daniel A. Manion, Circuit Judge and Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge. [6934171-1] [6934171] [17-3351]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Jennifer DiPerna v. Chicago School of Professional | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: JENNIFER DIPERNA | |
| Represented By: | Jason J. Bach |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: CHICAGO SCHOOL OF PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY | |
| Represented By: | Alisa B. Arnoff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
