Yuchin Otgonnamar v. Jefferson Sessions III
YUCHIN OTGONNAMAR, also known as GANAA OTGOO |
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General of the United States |
17-3622 |
December 27, 2017 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Otgonnamar Yuchin v. Jefferson Sessions III |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 703243161 Filed Nonprecedential Disposition PER CURIAM. We therefore DENY the petition for review. Diane P. Wood, Chief Judge; Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge and Michael Y. Scudder, Circuit Judge. [6935022-1] [6935022] [17-3622] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Yuchin Otgonnamar v. Jefferson Sessions III | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: YUCHIN OTGONNAMAR, also known as GANAA OTGOO | |
Represented By: | Yuchin Otgonnamar |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General of the United States | |
Represented By: | OIL |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.