Harold Gardner v. T.G. Werlich
| HAROLD GARDNER |
| T.G. WERLICH, Warden |
| 19-1003 |
| January 2, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: Appellant Harold Gardner shall have thirty days from the date at the top of this order to file a memorandum explaining why this court should not summarily affirm the district court's judgment. Briefing in this case is otherwise SUSPENDED pending further order of the court. MPB [9] [6988904] [19-1003] (VG) [Entered: 03/06/2019 08:22 AM]
|
| Filing 8 Filed District Court order GRANTING leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Gardner is DIRECTED to pay the $19.97 to the Clerk of Court upon receipt of this Memorandum and Order. Payment shall be mailed to: Clerk of the Court, United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, 750 Missouri Ave., East St. Louis, Illinois 62201. Date IFP granted: 02/14/2019. Partial fee due 02/28/2019. [8] [6984488] [19-1003] (CAG) [Entered: 02/14/2019 11:42 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed notice from the District Court that a motion to proceed in forma pauperis is pending. [7] [6983278] [19-1003] (AP) [Entered: 02/08/2019 03:18 PM] |
|
Filing 6
Order issued TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. JR [6] [6983122] [19-1003] (MM) [Entered: 02/08/2019 10:35 AM]
|
| Filing 5 Prose motion filed by Appellant Harold Gardner to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [5] [6983117] [19-1003] (MM) [Entered: 02/08/2019 10:26 AM] |
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Harold Gardner. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [4] [6983116] [19-1003] (MM) [Entered: 02/08/2019 10:16 AM] |
| Filing 3 Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 14 day notice to file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or pay the docketing fee in the District Court. Fee or IFP forms due on 02/15/2019 for Appellant Harold Gardner [3] [6981424] [19-1003] (CAG) [Entered: 02/01/2019 11:36 AM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Appellant Harold Gardner is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Harold Gardner by 02/05/2019. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7016 0340 0001 1334 8735. JR [2] [6979215] [19-1003] (MM) [Entered: 01/22/2019 11:17 AM]
|
| Filing 1 Federal prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Harold Gardner by 01/04/2019. Fee or IFP forms due on 01/16/2019 for Appellant Harold Gardner. Transcript information sheet due by 01/16/2019. [1] [6974992] [19-1003] (AP) [Entered: 01/02/2019 11:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Harold Gardner v. T.G. Werlich | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: HAROLD GARDNER | |
| Represented By: | Harold Gardner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: T.G. WERLICH, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Donald S. Boyce |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
