Jeffrey Gurley v. Correctional Officer Hubber, et al
Defendant / Appellee: COOK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Corporation, SERGEANT GOTAY, John Doe #17, CERMAK HEALTH SERVICES, a division of the Cook County Health and Hospital System, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER WEDEL, John Doe #18 and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HUBBER, John Doe #16
Plaintiff / Appellant: JEFFREY R. GURLEY
Case Number: 19-1034
Filed: January 4, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER re: Motion to withdraw. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED pursuant to FRAP 42(b). The appellant shall remit to the clerk of the district court the $505 appellate fees. Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [13][6989056] [19-1034] (PS) [Entered: 03/06/2019 01:08 PM]
March 6, 2019 FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 03/06/2019 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [6989062-2] [6989062] [19-1034] (PS) [Entered: 03/06/2019 01:35 PM]
March 5, 2019 Filing 12 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Jeffrey R. Gurley to dismiss case pursuant to FRAP 42(b). [12] [6988969] [19-1034] (FP) [Entered: 03/06/2019 09:44 AM]
February 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: 1. Motion for attorney representation. 2. Motion. [ # 9 ] This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the docket indicates that the appellant's fee status has not yet been determined. Accordingly, the motion for attorney representation is DENIED without court action, pursuant to the court's fee notice and order dated January 4, 2019. In light of the court's order dated February 5, 2019, the motion to withdraw will be filed without court action. The appellant is reminded that if he would like to dismiss this appeal, he should file a motion that does not ask the court for additional relief beyond dismissal. CMD [11] [6984572] [19-1034] (PS) [Entered: 02/14/2019 02:49 PM]
February 12, 2019 Filing 10 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Jeffrey R. Gurley leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 02/11/2019. [10] [6984032] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 03/14/2019. [19-1034] (DSL) [Entered: 02/12/2019 04:00 PM]
February 12, 2019 Filing 9 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Jeffrey R. Gurley for appointment of counsel. (Forwarded by the District Court) [9] [6983938] [19-1034] (VG) [Entered: 02/12/2019 01:49 PM]
February 12, 2019 Filing 8 Filed letter from Appellant Jeffrey R. Gurley. (Forwarded from the District Court) [8] [6983936] [19-1034] (VG) [Entered: 02/12/2019 01:46 PM]
February 12, 2019 Filing 7 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Jeffrey R. Gurley. Prior or Related proceedings: No. (Forwarded from the District Court) [7] [6983935] [19-1034] (VG) [Entered: 02/12/2019 01:45 PM]
February 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER re: Motion. To the extent that the appellant seeks to voluntarily dismiss this appeal, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is DENIED without prejudice to renewal in a motion that clearly makes such a request and does not ask the court for additional relief beyond dismissal. Also, the appellant is reminded that voluntary dismissal does not relieve him of the obligation to pay the appellate filing fees. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b).[ # 5 ] [6] [6982395] CMD [19-1034] (AG) [Entered: 02/05/2019 03:59 PM]
February 1, 2019 Filing 5 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Jeffrey R. Gurley to "withdraw" his intent to file an appeal in case no. 18-cv-1383. [5] [6981581] [19-1034] (VG) [Entered: 02/01/2019 03:34 PM]
January 29, 2019 Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Jeffrey R. Gurley. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [4] [6981055] [19-1034] (PS) [Entered: 01/29/2019 03:46 PM]
January 4, 2019 Filing 3 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [3] [6975923] (Note: The Office of the Cook County County States Attorney has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [19-1034] (MM) [Entered: 01/07/2019 10:45 AM]
January 4, 2019 Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: John Does #1-4, John Does #6-12, John Doe #15, Superintendent Jones (John Doe #19), Jane Doe #20, Nurse Nwaru (Jane Doe #21), Sheriff Perez (John Doe #22), Sheriff Stover (John Doe #23), Sergeant Rogers (Jane Doe #24), John Doe #26, Ms. Lorinze (Jane Doe #27), Ms. Bridge (Jane Doe #28), Mr. Causaleno (John Doe #29), Ms. Davis (Jane Doe #31), Mr. Chavez (John Doe #32), Ms. Wilson, Mr. Kim, Mr. Orona, Mr. Hein, Mr. Baker, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Jane Doe #39, Mr. Powell, Mr. Jewel, Mr. Smith, Mr. Szul, Mr. Petterson, John Doe #47, Sheriff Baker, Sergeant McGorde, Ms. Santos, John Doe #52 and Ms. Houskin. [2] [6975917] [19-1034] (MM) [Entered: 01/07/2019 10:43 AM]
January 4, 2019 Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Jeffrey R. Gurley by 01/11/2019. Transcript information sheet due by 01/18/2019. [1] [6975877] [19-1034] (MM) [Entered: 01/07/2019 10:16 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jeffrey Gurley v. Correctional Officer Hubber, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: COOK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SERGEANT GOTAY, John Doe #17
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CERMAK HEALTH SERVICES, a division of the Cook County Health and Hospital System
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CORRECTIONAL OFFICER WEDEL, John Doe #18
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HUBBER, John Doe #16
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: JEFFREY R. GURLEY
Represented By: Jeffrey R. Gurley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?