Gerson Naun Ramos Benegas v. William P. Barr
GERSON NAUN RAMOS BENEGAS |
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States and MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General of the United States |
19-1275 |
February 14, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 14 The Administrative Record has been filed with this court. Agency brief #1 due on or before 04/15/2019 for Petitioner Gerson Naun Ramos Benegas pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 31 and Cir. R. 31. [6988406] [19-1275] (GW) [Entered: 03/04/2019 02:14 PM] |
Filing 13 Certified Administrative Record filed by the Executive Office for Immigration Review. Petitioner detained: Yes. [6988365] [19-1275] (Executive Office Of Immigration Review, DOJ) [Entered: 03/04/2019 12:46 PM] |
Filing 12 Certified Administrative Record filed by the Executive Office for Immigration Review. Petitioner detained: Yes. [6988363] [19-1275] (Executive Office Of Immigration Review, DOJ) [Entered: 03/04/2019 12:40 PM] |
|
Notice of fee payment. Receipt #000396. [6986734-2] [6986734] [19-1275] (CCG) [Entered: 02/25/2019 01:58 PM] |
Filing 10 Filed Response by Respondent William P. Barr to Petitioner's Emergency Motion for Stay of Removal (Dkt. No. 2-1). [10][6986336] [19-1275] (Bowen, Jennifer) [Entered: 02/22/2019 10:56 AM] |
Filing 9 Appearance form filed by Attorney Jennifer A. Bowen for Respondent William P. Barr in 19-1276, 19-1275. [9] [6984820] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [19-1276, 19-1275] --[Edited 02/15/2019 by AP- to reflect the addition of counsel] (Bowen, Jennifer) [Entered: 02/15/2019 10:55 AM] |
Filing 8 Respondent Matthew G. Whitaker has been substituted by Respondent William P. Barr in 19-1275 &19-1276, pursuant to FRAP 43(c). [8] [6984721] [19-1275, 19-1276] (AP) [Entered: 02/15/2019 09:00 AM] |
Filing 7 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Mark A. Flessner for Petitioner Gerson Naun Ramos Benegas. [7] [6984675] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [19-1275] (Flessner, Mark) [Entered: 02/14/2019 04:34 PM] |
Filing 6 Appearance form filed by Attorney Jennifer A. Bowen for Respondent Matthew G. Whitaker in 19-1275, 19-1276. [6] [6984673] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [19-1275, 19-1276] --[Edited 02/15/2019 by AP- to reflect the addition of counsel] (Bowen, Jennifer) [Entered: 02/14/2019 04:25 PM] |
Filing 5 Added Attorney(s) Anthony Cardozo Payne for party(s) Respondent Matthew G. Whitaker, in case 19-1275 Attorney(s) Anthony Cardozo Payne for party(s) Respondent Matthew G. Whitaker, in case 19-1276 per appearance form. Appearance form filed by Attorney Anthony C. Payne for Respondent Matthew G. Whitaker in 19-1275, 19-1276. [5] [6984578] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [19-1275, 19-1276]--[Edited 02/14/2019 by AD to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Payne, Anthony) [Entered: 02/14/2019 02:55 PM] |
|
Filing 3 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Mr. Charles Roth for Petitioner Gerson Naun Ramos Benegas. [3] [6984491] [19-1275] (MM) [Entered: 02/14/2019 11:48 AM] |
Filing 2 Pro se Motion filed by Petitioner Gerson Naun Ramos Benegas for stay removal. Exhibits A-D attached with motion. [2] [6984490] [19-1275]--[Edited 02/14/2019 by MM to change type of motion.] (MM) [Entered: 02/14/2019 11:46 AM] |
Filing 1 Petition for Review docketed with proof of service, pursuant to FRAP 15(c). Fee due. Agency record or certified list due by 03/26/2019. Fee or IFP forms due on 02/28/2019 for Petitioner Gerson Naun Ramos Benegas. [1] [6984485] [19-1275] (MM) [Entered: 02/14/2019 11:35 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.