Shawn Riley v. David Ewing
| DAVID EWING, Chaplain |
| SHAWN RILEY |
| 19-1279 |
| February 14, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER re: Declaration. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal shall proceed to briefing. The briefing schedule is as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 04/29/2019 for Shawn Riley. Appellee's brief due on or before 05/29/2019 for David Ewing. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 06/19/2019 for Appellant Shawn Riley. DW [6992307] [19-1279] (AP) [Entered: 03/21/2019 10:13 AM]
|
| Filing 8 Filed Declaration of Appellant Shawn Riley, pursuant to the Court's order of February 28, 2019. [8] [6991470] [19-1279] (PS) [Entered: 03/18/2019 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 7 Appearance form filed by Attorney Jody J. Schmelzer for Appellee David Ewing. [7] [6988390] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [19-1279]-[Edited 03/04/2019 by VG - to reflect termination and addition of counsel] (Schmelzer, Jody) [Entered: 03/04/2019 01:45 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Shawn Riley. [6] [6988224] [19-1279] (FP) [Entered: 03/04/2019 08:50 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Shawn Riley. [5] [6988223] [19-1279] (FP) [Entered: 03/04/2019 08:48 AM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: The appellant shall file a notarized statement or a declaration (in compliance with 28 U.S.C. sec. 1746) setting forth the date the notice of appeal was deposited in the prison's internal mail system and stating whether first class postage was prepaid. See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(c). DW [4] Statement due for Appellant Shawn Riley by 03/15/2019. [4] [6987870] [19-1279] (AD) [Entered: 02/28/2019 04:26 PM]
|
| Filing 3 FILED NOTICE FROM THE DISTRICT COURT THAT THE $505.00 APPELLATE FEE WAS RECEIVED. [3][6987325] [19-1279] (CCG) [Entered: 02/27/2019 09:50 AM] |
| Filing 2 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Shawn Riley. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [2] [6986813] [19-1279] (VG) [Entered: 02/25/2019 03:50 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Shawn Riley by 02/21/2019. Transcript information sheet due by 02/28/2019. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 03/18/2019. [1] [6984525] [19-1279] (PS) [Entered: 02/14/2019 12:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Shawn Riley v. David Ewing | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: DAVID EWING, Chaplain | |
| Represented By: | Rebecca Ann Paulson |
| Represented By: | Jody J. Schmelzer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: SHAWN RILEY | |
| Represented By: | Shawn Riley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
