Daniel Troya v. Williams Wilson, et al
| MICHAEL RUMSKA, HSA, SUSAN PORTER, RN, WILLIAMS E. WILSON, M.D., CINDY MCGEE, NR-P and HEATHER MATA, PA-C |
| DANIEL A. TROYA |
| 19-1352 |
| February 26, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Daniel A. Troya leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 04/12/2019. District Court has assessed a $46.33 initial partial filing fee. [8] [6997815] PLRA initial partial filing fee due by 05/13/2019. [19-1352] (CM) [Entered: 04/12/2019 03:45 PM] |
| Filing 7 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Daniel A. Troya. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [7] [6994571] [19-1352] (CAG) [Entered: 04/01/2019 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed district court order dated 03/27/2019: The Court's March 6, 2019 Entry discussing request to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is vacated. Nonetheless, Mr. Troya's request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, dkt. 96 , is denied as presented. He shall have through April 26, 2019, in which to renew his motion to proceed in forma pauperis by attaching a copy of the transactions associated with his institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his appeal on February 25, 2019. Otherwise, the plaintiff must pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee. [6] [6994285] [19-1352] (DSL) [Entered: 03/29/2019 04:40 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER: re: Letter. [ # 4 ]; This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the docket indicates that the appellant's fee status has not yet been determined. Accordingly, to the extent that the appellant seeks an extension of time. The motion is GRANTED to the extent that the appellant shall file the Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement by April 2, 2019. Further, a review of the court's docket indicates that on March 7, 2019, the district court denied the appellant's motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. The appellant is reminded that he must either pay the $505.00 filing fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and a PLRA memorandum in support with the clerk of this court by April 8, 2019. [5] [6990923] CMD [19-1352] (CAG) [Entered: 03/15/2019 08:54 AM]
|
| Filing 4 Letter filed by Appellant Daniel A. Troya. [4] [6990043] [19-1352] (VG) [Entered: 03/11/2019 03:52 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Daniel A. Troya leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 03/07/2019. [3] [6989483] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 04/08/2019 [19-1352] (CCG) [Entered: 03/07/2019 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEE: John Doe [2] [6987170] [19-1352] (AP) [Entered: 02/26/2019 02:23 PM] |
| Filing 1 Federal prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Daniel A. Troya by 03/04/2019. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 03/28/2019. Transcript information sheet due by 03/12/2019. [1] [6987166] [19-1352] (AP) [Entered: 02/26/2019 02:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
