Albert Johnson v. Glen Austin, et al
ALBERT L. JOHNSON |
PRISONER REVIEW BOARD SUPERVISOR, JUDY OAKLEY, Parole Agent, MARK SCHAFER, Champaign County Parole Supervisor, NANCY COURTWRIGHT, Records Office Supervisor at Logan Correctional Center and GLEN AUSTIN, Warden |
19-1445 |
March 12, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER re: Motion to withdraw as Attorney of Record. [ # 7 ] IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED and attorney Eric M. Schwing may withdraw from further representation of the appellant. Also, the Circuit Rule 33 mediation scheduled for April 4, 2019, is VACATED. Appellant Albert L. Johnson is reminded that he will be proceeding pro se unless he secures new counsel. In the event new counsel appears on behalf of the appellant, Circuit Rule 33 mediation may be reinstated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appellant file the overdue docketing statement by April 19, 2019. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this appeal. See Cir. R. 3(c). Finally, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 05/06/2019 for Albert L. Johnson. Appellees' brief due on or before 06/05/2019 for Glen Austin, Warden, Nancy Courtwright, Judy Oakley, Prisoner Review Board Supervisor and Mark Schafer. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 06/26/2019 for Appellant Albert L. Johnson. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7018 0680 0002 2683 5910. CMD [8] [6995112] [19-1445] (VG) [Entered: 04/03/2019 12:58 PM] |
Filing 7 Attorney Motion filed by Attorney Eric Schwing for Appellant Albert L. Johnson to withdraw as counsel [7] [6995000] [19-1445]--[Edited 04/03/2019 by VG - to reflect attorney motion filed] (Schwing, Eric) [Entered: 04/03/2019 09:31 AM] |
Filing 6 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Eric M. Schwing for Appellant Albert L. Johnson. [6] [6994383] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [19-1445] (Schwing, Eric) [Entered: 04/01/2019 10:47 AM] |
Filing 5 ORDER: Appellant Albert L. Johnson is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Albert L. Johnson by 04/10/2019 JR. [5] [6993469] [19-1445] (MM) [Entered: 03/27/2019 10:55 AM] |
Filing 4 Appearance form filed by Attorney Maura Forde O'Meara for Appellees Glen Austin, Nancy Courtwright, Judy Oakley and Mark Schafer. [4] [6993456] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [19-1445]--[Edited 03/27/2019 by FP to reflect that atty. Wichern is termed and atty. O'Meara is added to the docket.] (O'Meara, Maura) [Entered: 03/27/2019 10:26 AM] |
Filing 3 ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 05/06/2019 for Albert L. Johnson. Appellee's brief due on or before 06/05/2019 for Glen Austin, Warden, Nancy Courtwright, Judy Oakley, Prisoner Review Board Supervisor and Mark Schafer. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 06/26/2019 for Appellant Albert L. Johnson. JNS [6991744] [19-1445] (FP) [Entered: 03/19/2019 12:38 PM] |
Filing 2 Notice of Circuit Rule 33 mediation issued. The mediation will be conducted by phone, Thursday, April 4, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. Central Time. See Notice for further details and requirements. JNS. [2] [6991742] [19-1445]--[Edited 04/03/2019 by VG - VACATED per the court's 4/3/19 order] (FP) [Entered: 03/19/2019 12:34 PM] |
Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Albert L. Johnson by 03/19/2019. Transcript information sheet due by 03/26/2019. Appellant's brief due on or before 04/22/2019 for Albert L. Johnson. [1] [6990247] [19-1445] (ER) [Entered: 03/12/2019 02:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.