Vladimir Gorokhovsky v. City of Chicago
| VLADIMIR M. GOROKHOVSKY |
| CITY OF CHICAGO |
| 19-1506 |
| March 20, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Vladimir Gorokhovsky v. City of Chicago |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER issued GRANTING Appellants Motion to Extend Time to File Appellate Brief only to the extent that briefing will proceed as follows: [ # 6 ] Appellant's brief due on or before 06/13/2019 for Vladimir M. Gorokhovsky. Appellee's brief due on or before 07/15/2019 for City of Chicago. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 08/05/2019 for Appellant Vladimir M. Gorokhovsky. SCR [7] [7000803] [19-1506] (AD) [Entered: 04/26/2019 12:08 PM]
|
| Filing 6 Motion filed by Appellant Vladimir M. Gorokhovsky to extend time to file appellant brief main brief in cross-appeal brief. [6] [7000707] [19-1506]--[Edited 04/26/2019 by AP- to reflect correct document] (Gorokhovsky, Vladimir) [Entered: 04/25/2019 09:40 PM] |
| Filing 5 Amended Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Vladimir M. Gorokhovsky. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. Gorokhovsky v. City of Chicago, NDIL Case N. 1:18-cv-2800 [5] [6998577] [19-1506] (Gorokhovsky, Vladimir) [Entered: 04/16/2019 04:21 PM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: In the present case, appellant's Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement fails to set forth the dates on which he filed his notice of appeal. This information must be provided. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that appellant file a complete statement of jurisdiction that includes the date that he filed his notice of appeal. The statement is due on or before April 22, 2019.(See order for further details) DW [4] [4] [6998392] [19-1506] (VG) [Entered: 04/16/2019 11:17 AM]
|
| Filing 3 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Vladimir M. Gorokhovsky. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [3] [6998039] [19-1506] (AD) [Entered: 04/15/2019 01:06 PM] |
| Filing 2 Appearance form filed by Attorney MYRIAM ZRECZNY KASPER for Appellee City of Chicago. [2] [6993300] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [19-1506] [Edited 03/26/2019 by CAG to reflect the termination and addition of counsel.] (Kasper, Myriam) [Entered: 03/26/2019 02:12 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Transcript information sheet due by 04/03/2019. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Vladimir M. Gorokhovsky by 03/26/2019. Appellant's brief due on or before 04/29/2019 for Vladimir M. Gorokhovsky [1] [6992080] [19-1506] (VG) [Entered: 03/20/2019 01:47 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Vladimir Gorokhovsky v. City of Chicago | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: VLADIMIR M. GOROKHOVSKY | |
| Represented By: | Vladimir M. Gorokhovsky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: CITY OF CHICAGO | |
| Represented By: | Justin Tresnowski |
| Represented By: | Myriam Z. Kasper |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
