Peter Gakuba v. Mark Karner, et al
| SUSAN HANSON, FBI, 06gr1328, Individually and Officially, MARK KARNER, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Individually and Officially, JAMES COLEMAN, FBI, Individually and Officially, TIMOTHY SIMON, FBI, Individually and Officially and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| PETER GAKUBA |
| 19-1597 |
| April 2, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED for failure to pay the required docketing fee pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). The appellant shall remit to the clerk of the district court the $505 appellate fees. Mandate issued, no record to be returned. The appellant has neither paid the $505 appellate fees nor filed a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in the district court.[8][7005130] [19-1597] (CM) [Entered: 05/16/2019 10:14 AM] |
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 05/16/2019 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7005141-2] [7005141] [19-1597] (CM) [Entered: 05/16/2019 10:26 AM] |
Filing 7
ORDER re: Motions to consolidate appeals or alternatively, to dismiss. These appeals are subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and, therefore, all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). Because the appellant's fee status in each of these appeals remains pending, IT IS ORDERED that the motions are DENIED without court action, pursuant to the court's fee notices and orders dated March 25, 2019, April 2, 2019, and April 8, 2019. [ # 6999752-2 ] [ # 6998350-3 ] [ # 6998339-3 ] [ # 6 ] [ # 5 ] [ # 4 ] [ # 6999752-3 ] [ # 6998350-2 ] [ # 6998339-2 ] [ # 5 ] [ # 4 ] [7] [6999970] CMD [19-1536, 19-1598, 19-1640, 19-1537, 19-1597, 19-1641] (AP) [Entered: 04/23/2019 03:46 PM]
|
| Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Mr. Peter Gakuba to consolidate appeals or alternatively dismiss without prejudice as duplicitous. [6] [6999755] [19-1537, 19-1597, 19-1641] (AP) [Entered: 04/23/2019 10:39 AM] |
| Filing 5 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Mr. Peter Gakuba to consolidate case with 19-1537 or to consolidate with 19-1536, 19-1598, and 19-1537. [5] [6998352] [19-1597, 19-1537] (AG) [Entered: 04/16/2019 10:14 AM] |
| Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Mr. Peter Gakuba to consolidate case with 19-1597; or to consolidate with 19-1536, 19-1598, and 19-1597; or to dismiss as duplicative. [4] [6998346] [19-1537, 19-1597] (AG) [Entered: 04/16/2019 10:06 AM] |
| Filing 3 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Mr. Peter Gakuba. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 18-3398. [3] [6998310] [19-1597] (AG) [Entered: 04/16/2019 09:36 AM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Ronnie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Individually and Officially, and John & Jane Does 1 through 25. [2] [6995051] [19-1597] (PS) [Entered: 04/03/2019 10:46 AM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's federal civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Peter Gakuba by 04/03/2019. Transcript information sheet due by 04/16/2019. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 05/02/2019. [1] [6995044] [19-1597] (PS) [Entered: 04/03/2019 10:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
