Richard Kelly v. Paul Talbot, et al
Defendant / Appellee: PAUL A. TALBOT, Doctor, HOUMAN KIANI, Doctor, MIKE PERSON, DOUGLAS BEITLER, LPN and FAKHRY RAFIQ, Doctor
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD L. KELLY
Case Number: 19-1664
Filed: April 11, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 3, 2019 Filing 11 Filed Appellant Richard L. Kelly Memorandum In Support of PLRA Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis. [11] [7008907] [19-1664] (FP) [Entered: 06/04/2019 11:28 AM]
June 3, 2019 Filing 10 Prose motion filed by Appellant Richard L. Kelly to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [10] [7008843] [19-1664] (FP) [Entered: 06/04/2019 10:12 AM]
May 8, 2019 Filing 9 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Richard L. Kelly leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 05/08/2019. [9] [7003347] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 06/07/2019. [19-1664] (DSL) [Entered: 05/08/2019 03:20 PM]
May 7, 2019 Filing 8 Filed notice from the District Court that a motion to proceed in forma pauperis is pending. [8] [7002903] [19-1664] (DSL) [Entered: 05/07/2019 10:01 AM]
April 23, 2019 Filing 7 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Richard L. Kelly. Prior or Related proceedings: No. (Document forwarded from the district court) [7] [6999774] [19-1664] (PS) [Entered: 04/23/2019 11:19 AM]
April 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: re: Motion for appointment/recruitment of appellant counsel. [ # 5 ] This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the docket indicates that the appellant's fee status has not yet been determined. Accordingly, the motion is DENIED without court action, pursuant to this court's fee notice and order dated April 11, 2019. Further, the appellant is reminded that he must either pay the $505.00 filing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis with the district court by May 13, 2019.[6] [6999714] CMD [19-1664] (CAG) [Entered: 04/23/2019 09:45 AM]
April 22, 2019 Filing 5 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Richard L. Kelly for appointment of counsel. [5] [6999642] [19-1664] (CAG) [Entered: 04/22/2019 04:31 PM]
April 22, 2019 Filing 4 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Richard L. Kelly. [4] [6999626] [19-1664] (AP) [Entered: 04/22/2019 04:22 PM]
April 22, 2019 Filing 3 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Richard L. Kelly. [3] [6999362] [19-1664] (Moxley, David) [Entered: 04/22/2019 06:25 AM]
April 11, 2019 Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEE: Barbara Brubaker, NP. [2] [6997612] [19-1664] (MM) [Entered: 04/12/2019 10:45 AM]
April 11, 2019 Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet filed. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 05/13/2019. [1] [6997596] [19-1664] (MM) [Entered: 04/12/2019 10:14 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Richard Kelly v. Paul Talbot, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PAUL A. TALBOT, Doctor
Represented By: Jeb A. Crandall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HOUMAN KIANI, Doctor
Represented By: Jeb A. Crandall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MIKE PERSON
Represented By: Jeb A. Crandall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DOUGLAS BEITLER, LPN
Represented By: Jeb A. Crandall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: FAKHRY RAFIQ, Doctor
Represented By: Jeb A. Crandall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: RICHARD L. KELLY
Represented By: Richard L. Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?