DeWayne Perry v. Richard Brown
| RICHARD BROWN |
| DEWAYNE PERRY |
| 19-1683 |
| April 12, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Order issued GRANTING motion for appointment of counsel. A separate order naming counsel and setting a new briefing schedule will follow. Briefing remains suspended pending further order of the court. [ # 5 ] JLW [9] [7007477] [19-1683] (ER) [Entered: 05/28/2019 03:11 PM]
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER re: 1) Motion for Appointment of Counsel and Request for Oral Argument. 2) Motion for Appeal to Be Heard Pursuant to Rule 24(C). Briefing in this appeal is SUSPENDED pending resolution of the appellant's motion for appointment of counsel. Accordingly, the motion for appeal to be heard on the original record is DENIED without prejudice to renewal, if still necessary, once the court rules on the motion for appointment of counsel and briefing in this appeal has been reinstated. [ # 7 ] CMD [8] [7005673] [19-1683] (AD) [Entered: 05/17/2019 04:23 PM]
|
| Filing 7 Pro se motion filed by Appellant DeWayne Perry to be heard pursuant to Rule 24(C). [7] [7005634] [19-1683] (ER) [Entered: 05/17/2019 03:30 PM] |
| Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant DeWayne Perry to extend time to file appellant's brief. [6] [7005633] [19-1683] (ER) [Entered: 05/17/2019 03:29 PM] |
| Filing 5 Pro se motion filed by Appellant DeWayne Perry for appointment of counsel and request for oral argument. [5] [7005632] [19-1683] (ER) [Entered: 05/17/2019 03:28 PM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: In light of the district court's order dated 4/29/2019, this appeal shall proceed to briefing. The briefing schedule is as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 05/30/2019 for DeWayne Perry. Appellee's brief due on or before 07/01/2019 for Richard Brown. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 07/22/2019 for Appellant DeWayne Perry. CH [7001398] [19-1683] (CMD) [Entered: 04/30/2019 10:12 AM]
|
| Filing 3 An order has been received from the District Court dated 04/29/2019, granting a certificate of appealability. This appeal shall proceed accordingly. [3] [7001350] [19-1683] (CMD) [Entered: 04/30/2019 09:02 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant DeWayne Perry leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 04/29/2019. [2] [7001133] [19-1683] (VG) [Entered: 04/29/2019 02:07 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 03/18/2019. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet filed.. [1] [6997907] [19-1683] (AP) [Entered: 04/15/2019 09:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: DeWayne Perry v. Richard Brown | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: RICHARD BROWN | |
| Represented By: | Andrew A. Kobe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: DEWAYNE PERRY | |
| Represented By: | DeWayne Perry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
