Ricardo Gomez, et al v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, L, et al
| CAVALRY SPV I, LLC and CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC |
| RICARDO A. GOMEZ and DEBORA GOMEZ |
| 19-1737 |
| April 18, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Gomez v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 07/11/2019 for Debora Gomez and Ricardo A. Gomez. Appellee's brief due on or before 08/26/2019 for Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC and Cavalry SPV I, LLC. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 09/19/2019 for Appellants Debora Gomez and Ricardo A. Gomez. JB [7011487] [19-1737] (FP) [Entered: 06/14/2019 03:46 PM]
|
| Filing 8 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Matthew O. Stromquist for Appellees Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC and Cavalry SPV I, LLC. [8] [7002208] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [19-1737]-[Edited 05/02/2019 by VG - to reflect addition of counsel] (Stromquist, Matthew) [Entered: 05/02/2019 02:45 PM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 06/20/2019 for Debora Gomez and Ricardo A. Gomez. Appellee's brief due on or before 07/22/2019 for Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC and Cavalry SPV I, LLC. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 08/12/2019 for Appellants Debora Gomez and Ricardo A. Gomez. JB [7000655] [19-1737] (AD) [Entered: 04/25/2019 03:44 PM]
|
| Filing 6 Notice of Circuit Rule 33 mediation issued. The mediation will be conducted in Room 1120, Monday, May 20, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. Central Time. See Notice for further details and requirements. JB [6] [7000651] [19-1737] (AD) [Entered: 04/25/2019 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 5 Docketing Statement filed by Appellants Debora Gomez and Ricardo A. Gomez. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [5] [7000241] [19-1737] (Edelman, Daniel) [Entered: 04/24/2019 02:29 PM] |
| Filing 4 Added Attorney(s) Cassandra P. Miller for party(s) Appellant Ricardo A. Gomez Appellant Debora Gomez, in case 19-1737 per disclosure statement. Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure statement and Appearance form filed by Attorney Cassandra P. Miller for Appellants Debora Gomez and Ricardo A. Gomez. [4] [6999318] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [19-1737]--[Edited 04/19/2019 by AD to reflect the addition of counsel and proper document filed.] (Miller, Cassandra) [Entered: 04/19/2019 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Cathleen M. Combs for party(s) Appellant Ricardo A. Gomez Appellant Debora Gomez, in case 19-1737 per disclosure statement. Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure statement and Appearance form filed by Attorney Cathleen M. Combs for Appellants Debora Gomez and Ricardo A. Gomez. [3] [6999315] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [19-1737]--[Edited 04/19/2019 by AD to reflect the addition of counsel and proper document filed.] (Combs, Cathleen) [Entered: 04/19/2019 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 2 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance form filed by Attorney Daniel A. Edelman for Appellants Debora Gomez and Ricardo A. Gomez. [2] [6999311] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [19-1737]--[Edited 04/19/2019 by AD to reflect proper document filed.] (Edelman, Daniel) [Entered: 04/19/2019 03:29 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing Statement due for Appellants Debora Gomez and Ricardo A. Gomez by 04/24/2019. Transcript information sheet due by 05/02/2019. Appellant's brief due on or before 05/28/2019 for Debora Gomez and Ricardo A. Gomez [1] [6999133] [19-1737] (AP) [Entered: 04/19/2019 10:47 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
