USA v. Mitchell McGhee
| MITCHELL MCGHEE |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 19-1775 |
| April 23, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER re: Counse;'s motion to withdraw. IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, and attorney Varner is permitted to withdraw as appointed counsel. Defendant-appellant Mitchell McGhee is responsible for the prosecution of his appeal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this appeal shall proceed to briefing. The briefing schedule is as follows: [ # 3 ] Appellant's brief due on or before 07/17/2019 for Mitchell McGhee. Appellee's brief due on or before 08/16/2019 for United States of America. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 09/06/2019 for Appellant Mitchell McGhee DW [7] [7009772] [19-1775] (AP) [Entered: 06/07/2019 10:07 AM]
|
| Filing 6 Filed Attorney Response by Appellant Mitchell McGhee Attorney Sara J Varner to Court Order of 4/26/19. [6][7002590] [19-1775] (Varner, Sara) [Entered: 05/03/2019 09:17 PM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Attorney Varner shall file, on or before May 3, 2019, a brief memorandum addressing whether the court is required to appoint Mr. McGhee new counsel in this matter a motion to reduce sentence under the First Step Act of 2018. See, e.g., United States v. Foster, 706 F.3d 887, 888 (7th Cir. 2013). And, if not required to do so, why the court should exercise its discretion to appoint counsel in this particular case. Briefing in this appeal is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for details) DW [5] [7000899] [19-1775] (AP) [Entered: 04/26/2019 03:20 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Mitchell McGhee. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [4] [7000550] [19-1775] (Varner, Sara) [Entered: 04/25/2019 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 Attorney Motion filed by Attorney Sara J. Varner for Appellant Mitchell McGhee to withdraw as counsel [3] [7000545] [19-1775]--[Edited 04/25/2019 by VG - to reflect attorney motion filed] (Varner, Sara) [Entered: 04/25/2019 12:28 PM] |
| Filing 2 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Sara J. Varner for Appellant Mitchell McGhee. [2] [7000023] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [19-1775] (Varner, Sara) [Entered: 04/23/2019 04:48 PM] |
| Filing 1 Criminal case docketed. IFP. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Mitchell McGhee by 04/26/2019. Transcript information sheet due by 05/07/2019. Appellant's brief due on or before 06/03/2019 for Mitchell McGhee. [1] [6999914] [19-1775] (PS) [Entered: 04/23/2019 03:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Mitchell McGhee | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: MITCHELL MCGHEE | |
| Represented By: | Mitchell McGhee |
| Represented By: | Sara J. Varner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Bradley A. Blackington |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
