Marco Machuca-Macedo v. William Barr
MARCO MACHUCA-MACEDO |
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States |
19-1827 |
April 29, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Filed Respondent's proof of efforts to effect delivery upon Petitioner by Respondent William P. Barr. [8] [7011259] [19-1827] (Melnik, Karen) [Entered: 06/14/2019 08:38 AM] |
Filing 7 ORDER re: The motion to dismiss filed by Respondent on June 11, 2019. IT IS ORDERED that respondent provide, on or before June 19, 2019, the court with a current address for petitioner Marco Machuca-Macedo. A number of documents that the court sent to petitioner were returned, marked Return to Sender Unable to Forward. Briefing in this appeal is SUSPENDED pending further court order. DW [7] [7011112] [19-1827] (AG) [Entered: 06/13/2019 12:34 PM] |
Filing 6 Motion filed by Respondent William P. Barr to dismiss case. [6] [7010355] [19-1827] (Melnik, Karen) [Entered: 06/11/2019 07:43 AM] |
Filing 5 ORDER re: Petitioner Marco Machuca-Macedos failure to respond to the courts order of May 1, 2019. IT IS ORDERED that respondent file, on or before June 11, 2019, a responsive memorandum addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the courts order of May 1, 2019. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent provide the court with petitioner Machuca-Macedos current placement and contact information, which also must be filed on or before June 11, 2019. DW [5] [7008942] [19-1827] (AG) [Entered: 06/04/2019 12:28 PM] |
Filing 4 Certified Administrative Record filed by the Executive Office for Immigration Review. Petitioner detained: Yes. [7007092] [19-1827] (Executive Office Of Immigration Review, DOJ) [Entered: 05/24/2019 01:57 PM] |
Filing 3 ORDER: Petitioner shall Marco Machuca-Macedo, on or before May 14, 2019, file a brief memorandum stating why this petition for review should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. (See order for details) DW [3] [7001832] [19-1827] (VG) [Entered: 05/01/2019 02:12 PM] |
Filing 2 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Karen L. Melnik for Respondent William P. Barr. [2] [7001440] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [19-1827] -[Edited 04/30/2019 by ER - added attorney Karen L. Melnik to the court's docket] (Melnik, Karen) [Entered: 04/30/2019 11:24 AM] |
Filing 1 Petition for Review docketed with proof of service, pursuant to FRAP 15(c). Fee due. Agency record or certified list due by 06/10/2019. Fee or IFP forms due on 05/13/2019 for Petitioner Marco Machuca-Macedo.[1] [7001195] [19-1827] (VG) [Entered: 04/29/2019 03:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Marco Machuca-Macedo v. William Barr | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States | |
Represented By: | Oil OIL |
Represented By: | Karen L. Melnik |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: MARCO MACHUCA-MACEDO | |
Represented By: | Marco Machuca-Macedo |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.