Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. v. Tiera Butler
| TIERA BUTLER |
| CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. |
| 19-1894 |
| May 8, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: Defendant-appellant filed a document on 06/26/2019, that we construe as a petition for rehearing. All of the judges on the panel have voted to deny rehearing. The petition for rehearing is therefore DENIED. [9] [7014649] [19-1894] (MM) [Entered: 07/01/2019 12:15 PM]
|
| Filing 8 15 copies Filed Petition for Rehearing by Appellant Tiera Butler. Dist. [8] [7013735] [19-1894] (DSL) [Entered: 06/26/2019 02:43 PM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER re: Papers filed in this appeal and review of the short record. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. (See order for further details) Diane P. Wood, Chief Circuit Judge; Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge and Michael Y. Scudder, Circuit Judge. [7] [7011731] [19-1894] (AG) [Entered: 06/17/2019 03:07 PM]
|
| Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Tiera Butler to stay garnishment proceedings and to resolve garnishment and request for emergency hearing. Exhibits A & B attached. [6] [7011308] [19-1894] (VG) [Entered: 06/14/2019 09:50 AM] |
| Filing 5 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellee Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.. [5] [7006211] [19-1894] (Starzec, Michael) [Entered: 05/21/2019 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 3 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Michael L. Starzec for Appellee Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.. [3] [7006113] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [19-1894] [3] [7006113] [19-1894]--[Edited 05/21/2019 by CMD to reflect termination and addition of counsel.] (Starzec, Michael) [Entered: 05/21/2019 11:42 AM] |
| Filing 4 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Tiera Butler. [4] [7006196] [19-1894] (VG) [Entered: 05/21/2019 03:13 PM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Both appellant and appellee shall file, on or before May 23, 2019, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) DW [7003582][2] [7003582] [19-1894] (PS) [Entered: 05/09/2019 01:01 PM]
|
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet filed. Appellant's brief due on or before 06/17/2019 for Tiera Butler. [1] [7003358] [19-1894] (CAG) [Entered: 05/08/2019 03:42 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. v. Tiera Butler | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: TIERA BUTLER | |
| Represented By: | Tiera Butler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Burris |
| Represented By: | Michael L. Starzec |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
