Antonio Williams v. William Pollard
WILLIAM POLLARD |
ANTONIO WILLIAMS |
19-1922 |
May 14, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER re: Attorney Henaks Response to Order to Show Cause. The Rule to Show Cause, which issued on July 2, 2019, is DISCHARGED. DW [10] [7015348] [19-1922] (PS) [Entered: 07/03/2019 01:25 PM] |
Filing 9 Filed Attorney Response by Appellant Antonio Williams Attorney Robert R. Henak to Order to Show Cause dated July 2, 2019. [9][7015105] [19-1922] (Henak, Robert) [Entered: 07/02/2019 03:17 PM] |
Filing 8 Amended Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Antonio Williams. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [8] [7015102] [19-1922] (Henak, Robert) [Entered: 07/02/2019 03:15 PM] |
Filing 7 ORDER: The court, on its own motion, orders attorney Robert R. Henak to show cause for his failure to respond to the courts order of May 15, 2019. Attorney Henak shall file his response on or before July 9, 2019. Counsel is advised that failure to respond may result in monetary or disciplinary sanctions. DW [7] [7015009] [19-1922] (AD) [Entered: 07/02/2019 11:47 AM] |
Filing 6 Motion filed by Appellant Antonio Williams for Certificate of Appealability w/ attached Certificate of Service. [6] [7011938] [19-1922] (Henak, Robert) [Entered: 06/18/2019 11:13 AM] |
Filing 5 Motion filed by Appellant Antonio Williams Appointment of Counsel on Appeal w/ attached Certificate of Service. [5] [7011935] [19-1922] (Henak, Robert) [Entered: 06/18/2019 11:11 AM] |
Filing 4 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Robert R. Henak for Appellant Antonio Williams. [4] [7011722] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [19-1922] (Henak, Robert) [Entered: 06/17/2019 02:59 PM] |
Filing 3 ORDER: The appellant shall file a complete statement of jurisdiction that includes the date(s) of consent of the parties. The statement is due on or before May 22, 2019. (See order for details). DW [3] [7004856] [19-1922] (AP) [Entered: 05/15/2019 12:03 PM] |
Filing 2 Notice to appellant VACATING the 05/14/2019 Circuit Rule 3(b) Fee Notice and Order. Attorney Robert Henak was appointed as counsel for the appellant on 5/3/2018, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3006A(a)(2)(B). The fee status in appeal no. 19-1922 is considered in forma pauperis. This appeal shall proceed to a ruling on a certificate of appealability. [2] [7004815] [19-1922] (JR) [Entered: 05/15/2019 11:01 AM] |
Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 04/30/2019. Fee due. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 05/28/2019. Fee or IFP forms due on 05/28/2019 for Appellant Antonio Williams. [1] [7004670] [19-1922] (FP) [Entered: 05/14/2019 03:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Antonio Williams v. William Pollard | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: WILLIAM POLLARD | |
Represented By: | Robert G. Probst |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: ANTONIO WILLIAMS | |
Represented By: | Robert R. Henak |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.