Mark Hughes v. Robert Carter, et al
| ROBERT E. CARTER, Comm., KEITH BUTTS, Warden, DOES 1-100 and CARL KUENZLI, MD Regional Director |
| MARK S. HUGHES |
| 19-1967 |
| May 21, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED for failure to pay the required docketing fee pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). The appellant shall remit to the clerk of the district court the $505 appellate fees. Mandate issued, no record to be returned. The appellant has neither paid the $505 appellate fees nor filed a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in the district court.[3][7016652] [19-1967] (DS) [Entered: 07/11/2019 09:33 AM] |
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 07/11/2019 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7016659-2] [7016659] [19-1967] (DS) [Entered: 07/11/2019 10:04 AM] |
| Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7006171] [19-1967] (AD) [Entered: 05/21/2019 02:37 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet filed. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 06/20/2019. [1] [7006168] [19-1967] (AD) [Entered: 05/21/2019 02:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.