Scott Schmidt v. Walworth County, Wisconsin, et al
| KIMBERLY S. BUSHEY, RICHARD G. CHANDLER, SHEILA REIF, WALWORTH COUNTY, WISCONSIN and WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE |
| SCOTT R. SCHMIDT |
| 19-2032 |
| May 29, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Scott Schmidt v. Walworth County, Wisconsin |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: The District Court granted plaintiff's request to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis on July 12, 2019. Accordingly, briefing will now proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 08/14/2019 for Scott R. Schmidt. Appellees' briefs due on or before 09/13/2019 for Kimberly S. Bushey, Sheila Reif, Walworth County, Wisconsin and Wisconsin Department of Revenue. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 10/04/2019 for Appellant Scott R. Schmidt. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). JR [7017159] [7017159] [19-2032] (PS) [Entered: 07/15/2019 09:05 AM]
|
| Filing 8 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Scott R. Schmidt leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 07/12/2019. [8] [7017113] [19-2032] (VG) [Entered: 07/12/2019 03:53 PM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: re: Motion to extend filing of appellant brief. [ # 6 ] A review of the docket indicates that the appellant's fee status is unresolved. Specifically, the appellant's motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending before the district court and, therefore, no brief is due at this time. Accordingly, the motion is DENIED without prejudice to renewal once the appellant's fee status has been determined and this court issues a briefing order. CMD [7] [7014911] [19-2032] (CAG) [Entered: 07/02/2019 09:27 AM]
|
| Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Scott R. Schmidt to extend time to file appellant's brief. [6] [7014749] [19-2032] (VG) [Entered: 07/01/2019 03:45 PM] |
| Filing 5 Prose motion filed by Appellant Scott R. Schmidt to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [5] [7009910] [19-2032] (AP) [Entered: 06/07/2019 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Scott R. Schmidt. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [4] [7009908] [19-2032] (AP) [Entered: 06/07/2019 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 3 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEE: Steve Gorton [3] [7007844] [19-2032] (ER) [Entered: 05/29/2019 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 2 No attorney(s) added for Appellee Richard G. Chandler, per District Court docket and information sheet. [2] [7007843] [19-2032] (ER) [Entered: 05/29/2019 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Transcript information sheet filed. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Scott R. Schmidt by 06/04/2019. [1] [7007839] [19-2032] (ER) [Entered: 05/29/2019 03:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
