Thomas Powers v. Paula Lodge, et al
THOMAS POWERS |
TAMMY TEEL, CASSANDRA SIMMONS and PAULA LODGE |
19-2149 |
June 17, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 Filed District Court order dated 08/12/2019. Plaintiff's motion to consolidate his appeals is denied [68] to the extent Plaintiff seeks action from the district court. Forwarded to JR. [23] [7023425] [19-2149] (JR) [Entered: 08/13/2019 04:10 PM] |
Filing 22 ORDER issued DENYING the Motion to Consolidate filed by appellant on August 12, 2019 without prejudice to its renewal at a later date. [ # 21 ] Appellant first must address the jurisdictional problem that exists in Appeal Nos. 19-2478, 19-2479, 19-2483 and 19-2490. The orders questioning appellate jurisdiction issued on August 8, 2019, calling for a response on or before August 26, 2019. If appellant chooses, he may file a joint response to the orders that issued in these four appeals. DW [22] [7023244] [19-2149] (AD) [Entered: 08/13/2019 10:53 AM] |
Filing 21 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Thomas Powers to consolidate cases. [21] [7023120] [19-2149] (FP) [Entered: 08/12/2019 04:34 PM] |
Filing 20 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Thomas Powers in 19-2149, 19-2480, 19-2479, 19-2478, 19-2483 & 19-2490 to consolidate cases. (Document forwarded from the District Court. Note: No NOA has been filed yet in 19-cv-4135.) [20] [7023100] [19-2149, 19-2478, 19-2479, 19-2480, 19-2483, 19-2490] (JR) [Entered: 08/12/2019 04:13 PM] |
Filing 19 ORDER: On consideration of the Jurisdictional Memorandum filed by appellees on August 6, 2019, IT IS ORDERED that appellees file, on or before August 27, 2019, a further status report regarding the disposition of appellants post-judgment filing. Briefing shall continue to be SUSPENDED pending further court order. DW [19] [7022170] [19-2149] (VG) [Entered: 08/07/2019 12:01 PM] |
Filing 18 Filed status report by Appellees Paula Lodge, Cassandra Simmons and Tammy Teel. [18] [7021894] [19-2149] (Unrath, Craig) [Entered: 08/06/2019 11:23 AM] |
Filing 17 Prose motion filed by Appellant Thomas Powers to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [17] [7021100] [19-2149] (AP) [Entered: 08/01/2019 02:46 PM] |
Filing 16 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Thomas Powers. [16] [7019676] [19-2149] (AP) [Entered: 07/26/2019 08:03 AM] |
Filing 15 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires lead counsel be admitted to practice within 30 days of the date the appeal/petition was docketed. The rule also requires any attorney wishing to present oral argument to be admitted. Our records indicate as of this date Attorney Theresa M. Powell for Appellees Paula Lodge, Tammy Teel and Cassandra Simmons has/have not been admitted to practice in this court. Within 21 days, please file your application for admission by going to: http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/forms/forms7.htm and choosing the link, "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit". [15] [7019474] [19-2149] (LJ) [Entered: 07/25/2019 10:24 AM] |
Filing 14 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Thomas Powers leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 07/23/2019. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 08/22/2019 for Appellant Thomas Powers. [7019008] [14] [7019008] [19-2149] (VG) [Entered: 07/23/2019 04:09 PM] |
Filing 13 ORDER re: Jurisdictional Memorandum filed by appellees on July 22, 2019. Appellees shall file, on or before August 5, 2019, a status report regarding the disposition of appellants post-judgment filing. Briefing shall continue to be SUSPENDED pending further court order. DW [13] [7018627] [19-2149] (PS) [Entered: 07/22/2019 01:50 PM] |
Filing 12 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellees Paula Lodge, Cassandra Simmons and Tammy Teel. [12] [7018534] [19-2149] (Unrath, Craig) [Entered: 07/22/2019 09:42 AM] |
Filing 11 ORDER: In light of appellant Thomas Powerss failure to respond to the courts order of June 18, 2019, IT IS ORDERED that appellees file, on or before July 26, 2019 a responsive memorandum addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the court's order of June 18, 2019. [11] [7017763] [19-2149] (VG) [Entered: 07/17/2019 10:57 AM] |
Filing 10 ORDER: re: Motion to dismiss. The appellant seeks to dismiss this appeal as duplicative of appeal no. 19-2182. In light of the courts order dated July 16, 2019, the motion to dismiss will be filed without further court action. To the extent that the appellant seeks to voluntarily dismiss this appeal, he should file a motion that complies with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If the appellant would like to proceed with this appeal, he is reminded of his obligation to respond to the courts order dated June 18, 2019. Accordingly, the appellant file either a memorandum in response to the courts order dated June 18, 2019, or a motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b), by no later than July 31, 2019. CMD [10] [7017567] [19-2149] (CAG) [Entered: 07/16/2019 02:36 PM] |
Filing 9 ORDER: The following is before the court: MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION, filed on July 15, 2019, by the pro se appellant. A review of the courts docket indicates that on July 3, 2019, the appellant filed a motion for voluntarily dismissal of related appeal no. 19-2182, and on July 8, 2019, appeal no. 19-2182 was dismissed. Appeal no. 19-2149 is the appellants only case pending before this court. The clerk shall send the appellant a copy of the July 8, 2019, order in appeal 19-2182. CMD [9] [7017537] [19-2149] (CAG) [Entered: 07/16/2019 12:47 PM] |
Filing 8 Filed letter motion for clarification from Appellant Thomas Powers. [8] [7017327] [19-2149]--[Edited 07/16/2019 by CAG to reflect letter filed as a motion.] (VG) [Entered: 07/15/2019 03:58 PM] |
Filing 7 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Thomas Powers to dismiss case pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [7] [7017099] [19-2149] (ER) [Entered: 07/12/2019 03:30 PM] |
Filing 6 ORDER re: Motion for clarification, filed on 7/1/19. The clerk shall send the appellant a copy of this court's public docket. Further, the appellant is reminded of his obligation to respond to the court's order dated June 18, 2019. [ # 5 ] CMD [6] [7015007] [19-2149] (FP) [Entered: 07/02/2019 11:44 AM] |
Filing 5 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Thomas Powers for status. [5] [7014903] [19-2149] (AG) [Entered: 07/02/2019 09:22 AM] |
Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Thomas Powers. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [4] [7012533] [19-2149] (VG) [Entered: 06/20/2019 12:27 PM] |
Filing 3 ORDER: On review of the short record, it appears that a timely post-decision motion was filed in the district court. Appellant(s) shall file a jurisdictional memorandum addressing the consequences of Rule 4(a)(4) on our jurisdiction. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to FRAP 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) DW [3] Jurisdictional memorandum due for Appellant Thomas Powers by 07/02/2019. [3] [7012124] [19-2149] (FP) [Entered: 06/18/2019 04:44 PM] |
Filing 2 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Craig L. Unrath for Appellees Paula Lodge, Cassandra Simmons and Tammy Teel. [2] [7011962] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [19-2149]-[Edited 06/18/2019 by VG - to reflect addition of counsel] (Unrath, Craig) [Entered: 06/18/2019 11:42 AM] |
Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Thomas Powers by 06/24/2019. Transcript information sheet due by 07/01/2019. [1] [7011887] [19-2149] (AP) [Entered: 06/18/2019 09:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.