Dennis Mikel v. Megan Miller, et al
| BRUCE IPPEL, Doctor, CHRISTOPHER NELSON, ESTHER HINTON, MEGAN MILLER and BARBARA BRUBAKER |
| DENNIS W. MIKEL |
| 19-2296 |
| July 9, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Christopher Andrew Farrington for Appellees Christopher Nelson, Bruce Ippel, Barbara Brubaker and Megan Miller. [8] [7028579] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [19-2296]] (Farrington, Christopher) [Entered: 09/06/2019 01:01 PM] |
| Filing 7 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Jeb A. Crandall for Appellees Christopher Nelson, Bruce Ippel, Barbara Brubaker and Megan Miller. [7] [7028577] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [19-2296]--[Edited 09/06/2019 by FP to reflect that atty. Crandall is added to the docket.] (Crandall, Jeb) [Entered: 09/06/2019 12:59 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER: TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance, per court's 9/5/2019 order. [6] [7028280] CMD [19-2296] (AG) [Entered: 09/05/2019 02:53 PM]
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: On September 3, 2019, the clerk received an overdue motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis from the appellant, which the clerk will construe as an implied request to recall the mandate. Construed as such, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. This court's final order dated August 21, 2019, is VACATED, the mandate is RECALLED, and this appeal is REINSTATED. The clerk shall forward the motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis to district court for consideration in the first instance. [ # 4 ] CMD [5] [7028265] [19-2296] (AG) [Entered: 09/05/2019 02:28 PM]
|
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 09/05/2019 Order Vacating Dismissal/Recalling Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7028277-2] [7028277] [19-2296] (AG) [Entered: 09/05/2019 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Prose motion filed by Dennis W. Mikel to recall the mandate. 1 copy of motion for in forma pauperis tendered. [4] [7027849] [19-2296] (AP) [Entered: 09/04/2019 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 3 IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED for failure to pay the required docketing fee pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). The appellant shall remit to the clerk of the district court the $505 appellate fees. Mandate issued, no record to be returned. The appellant has neither paid the $505 appellate fees nor filed a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in the district court.[3][7024883] [19-2296] (DRS) [Entered: 08/21/2019 10:22 AM] |
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 08/21/2019 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7024884-2] [7024884] [19-2296] (DRS) [Entered: 08/21/2019 10:31 AM] |
| Filing 2 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Aaron T. Craft for Appellee Esther Hinton. [2] [7018495] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [19-2296]--[Edited 07/22/2019 by PS - to correct document title and reflect the termination and addition of council.] (Craft, Aaron) [Entered: 07/22/2019 08:34 AM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet filed. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 08/08/2019. [1] [7016262] [19-2296] (AG) [Entered: 07/10/2019 09:12 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
