Curtis Smith v. USA
CURTIS SMITH |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
19-2314 |
July 11, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Pro se motion filed by Petitioner Curtis Smith for appointment of counsel. [3] [7016819] [19-2314] (ER) [Entered: 07/11/2019 02:43 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed Petitioner Curtis Smith Memorandum In Support of Application for leave to file a second or successive motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence. [2] [7016817] [19-2314] (ER) [Entered: 07/11/2019 02:42 PM] |
Filing 1 Application for an order authorizing the District Court to consider a second or successive petition for collateral review under 28 U.S.C. Section 2255 docketed. [1] [7016815] [19-2314] (ER) [Entered: 07/11/2019 02:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Curtis Smith v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Debra Riggs Bonamici |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: CURTIS SMITH | |
Represented By: | Curtis Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.