Vidal Rainey v. Craig Wilson, et al
| CRAIG M. WILSON, DONALD MORONEY, JAMES FIKE and JACOB D. PYLE |
| VIDAL RAINEY |
| 19-2386 |
| July 22, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER re: Motion for extension of time to file for pauper status, filed on August 29, 2019. The motion is GRANTED. The appellant shall either pay the $505.00 filing fees in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis with the clerk of this court, together with a PLRA memorandum in support, by September 30, 2019. [ # 4 ] [5] [7027256] CMD [19-2386] (FP) [Entered: 08/30/2019 02:12 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Vidal Rainey to extend time to file motion for in forma pauperis status. [4] [7027062] [19-2386] (PS) [Entered: 08/29/2019 04:33 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Vidal Rainey leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 07/30/2019. [3] [7020541] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 08/29/2019. [19-2386] (DSL) [Entered: 07/30/2019 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA IFP pending in the District Court. Transcript information sheet due by 08/05/2019. [1] [7018841] [19-2386] (CAG) [Entered: 07/23/2019 10:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
