NLRB v. Perkins Management Services
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD |
PERKINS MANAGEMENT SERVICES |
19-2389 |
July 23, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 Application for Summary Entry of a Judgment Enforcing an Order of the National Labor Relations Board docketed. U.S. Appeal. Proposed judgment order received. Letter issued requesting approval, objections or modifications regarding the proposed judgment. Proposed judgment response due 08/13/2019. [1] [7018924] [19-2389] (AD) [Entered: 07/23/2019 01:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: NLRB v. Perkins Management Services | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD | |
Represented By: | David Habenstreit |
Represented By: | Peter S. Ohr |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: PERKINS MANAGEMENT SERVICES | |
Represented By: | Tonya Ford |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.