Carl Doty v. Vipin Shah, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: CARL DOTY
Defendant / Appellee: WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., VIPIN SHAH, CHRISTINE BRANNON, Warden, BRITTANY EDWARD and ARTHUR FUNK, Doctor
Case Number: 19-2436
Filed: July 29, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER re: Request for extension of time for deadline. The motion is GRANTED to the extent the appellant shall file his PLRA memorandum by October 21, 2019. [ # 14 ] [15] [7031802] CMD [19-2436] (ER) [Entered: 09/20/2019 04:19 PM]
September 20, 2019 Filing 14 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Carl Doty to extend time to file plra memorandum. [14] [7031777] [19-2436] (AP) [Entered: 09/20/2019 03:47 PM]
September 20, 2019 Filing 13 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Carl Doty for certificate of appealability. [13] [7031743] [19-2436] (PS) [Entered: 09/20/2019 03:27 PM]
September 12, 2019 Filing 12 Filed district court order dated 09/11/2019: Plaintiff's motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis and motion to request counsel are denied [98], [100]. The Court already denied Plaintiff's prior motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis, and Plaintiff should mail his motion to request counsel to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. [12] [7029747] [19-2436] (DSL) [Entered: 09/12/2019 09:29 AM]
August 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER re: Motion for recruitment of counsel. This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the court's docket indicates that on August 29, 2019, the appellant filed his motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. However, the motion is incomplete because it does not include a PLRA memorandum in support. The appellant is reminded of his obligation to file the PLRA memorandum by September 5, 2019. (See the court's PLRA fee notice and order dated August 6, 2019.) Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this appeal. In light of the foregoing, the motion for recruitment of counsel is DENIED without court action, pursuant to the fee notice and order August 6, 2019. [ # 9 ] Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 70160340000113341927. [11] [7027316] CMD [19-2436] (CMD) [Entered: 08/30/2019 03:45 PM]
August 29, 2019 Filing 10 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Carl Doty. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [10] [7027038] [19-2436] (AG) [Entered: 08/29/2019 03:49 PM]
August 29, 2019 Filing 9 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Carl Doty for appointment of counsel. [9] [7027035] [19-2436] (AG) [Entered: 08/29/2019 03:47 PM]
August 29, 2019 Filing 8 Prose motion filed by Appellant Carl Doty to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [8] [7027031] [19-2436] (AG) [Entered: 08/29/2019 03:46 PM]
August 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: Motion for recuitment of counsel, filed on 8/8/19. 2. Affidavit, filed on 8/8/19. This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the docket indicates that the appellant's fee status has not yet been determined. Accordingly, any relief requested in the appellants filings is DENIED without court action, pursuant to this court's fee notice and order dated July 29, 2019. Further, the appellant is reminded that he must either pay the $505.00 filing fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and a PLRA memorandum in support with the clerk of this court by September 5, 2019. [ # 6 ] [ # 5 ] [7] [7023084] CMD [19-2436] (FP) [Entered: 08/12/2019 04:00 PM]
August 8, 2019 Filing 6 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Carl Doty. [6] [7022692] [19-2436] (MM) [Entered: 08/09/2019 11:02 AM]
August 8, 2019 Filing 5 Affidavit filed by Appellant Carl Doty.[5] [7022691] [19-2436] (MM) [Entered: 08/09/2019 11:00 AM]
August 8, 2019 Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Carl Doty for recruitment of counsel. [4] [7022688] [19-2436] (MM) [Entered: 08/09/2019 10:57 AM]
August 6, 2019 Filing 3 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Carl Doty leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 08/06/2019. [3] [7021970] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 09/05/2019. [19-2436] (DSL) [Entered: 08/06/2019 02:25 PM]
August 2, 2019 Filing 2 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Julie A. Teuscher for Appellees Vipin Shah, Arthur Funk, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and Brittany Edward. [2] [7021369] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [19-2436]--[Edited 08/02/2019 by PS - to reflect the termination and addition of counsel.] (Teuscher, Julie) [Entered: 08/02/2019 02:23 PM]
July 29, 2019 Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Carl Doty by 08/05/2019. Transcript information sheet due by 08/12/2019.. [1] [7020327] [19-2436] (AP) [Entered: 07/30/2019 09:42 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Carl Doty v. Vipin Shah, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CARL DOTY
Represented By: Carl Doty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.
Represented By: Brent J. Colbert
Represented By: Julie Ann Teuscher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: VIPIN SHAH
Represented By: Brent J. Colbert
Represented By: Julie Ann Teuscher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CHRISTINE BRANNON, Warden
Represented By: Nadine J. Wichern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BRITTANY EDWARD
Represented By: Brent J. Colbert
Represented By: Julie Ann Teuscher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ARTHUR FUNK, Doctor
Represented By: Brent J. Colbert
Represented By: Julie Ann Teuscher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?