Roger Cose v. Belinda Schrubbe
| BELINDA SCHRUBBE, RN |
| ROGER ALLEN COSE |
| 19-2462 |
| August 1, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Mandate issued. No record to be returned. [7] [7026902] [19-2462] (CAH) [Entered: 08/29/2019 12:16 PM] |
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 08/07/2019 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7026905-2] [7026905] [19-2462] (CAH) [Entered: 08/29/2019 12:19 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER: Letter, filed on August 12, 2019, by the pro se appellant. In light of the courts order dated August 7, 2019, which administratively closed this appeal, the letter will be filed without further court action. [6] [7023538] CMD [19-2462] (AD) [Entered: 08/14/2019 10:36 AM]
|
| Filing 5 Filed notice regarding appeal with copy of letter sent to the district court by Appellant Roger Allen Cose. [5] [7023211] [19-2462] (MM) [Entered: 08/13/2019 10:19 AM] |
| Filing 4 Appearance form filed by Attorney Brian P. Keenan for Appellee Belinda Schrubbe. [4] [7022446] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [19-2462]--[Edited 08/08/2019 by PS - to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Keenan, Brian) [Entered: 08/08/2019 11:48 AM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER re: Letter, forwarded from the District Court on August 5, 2019. Roger Cose has filed a letter explaining that he did not intend to file a notice of appeal and only asks for reconsideration from the district court. Review of the district court docket indicates that the district court did not consider the document construed as a notice of appeal to be complete. Because Cose has confirmed that he does not want to pursue this appeal, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is administratively CLOSED and no appellate filing fees shall be imposed. William J. Bauer, Circuit Judge. [3] [7022314] (PS) [Entered: 08/07/2019 04:23 PM]
|
| Filing 2 Filed letter from Appellant Roger Allen Cose regarding mistake in filing notice of appeal. (Forwarded from the District Court). [2] [7021556] [19-2462] (CMD) [Entered: 08/05/2019 12:16 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Roger Allen Cose by 08/05/2019. Transcript information sheet due by 08/15/2019. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 09/03/2019. [1] [7021149] [19-2462] (PS) [Entered: 08/01/2019 04:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Roger Cose v. Belinda Schrubbe | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: BELINDA SCHRUBBE, RN | |
| Represented By: | Gesina S. Carson |
| Represented By: | Brian Patrick Keenan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: ROGER ALLEN COSE | |
| Represented By: | Roger Allen Cose |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
