Edward Smith v. James Caruso, et al
JAMES CARUSO, Doctor, JADE DRILLING, CHERYL HANSEN, ANDREW TILDEN, Doctor and ARTHUR FUNK, Doctor |
EDWARD R. SMITH |
19-2714 |
September 6, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Filed Appellant Edward R. Smith Memorandum In Support of PLRA Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis. [5] [7037849] [19-2714] (VG) [Entered: 10/18/2019 03:43 PM] |
Filing 4 Prose motion filed by Appellant Edward R. Smith to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [4] [7037848] [19-2714] (VG) [Entered: 10/18/2019 03:41 PM] |
Filing 3 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Julie A. Teuscher for Appellees Jade Drilling, Cheryl Hansen, James Caruso, Andrew Tilden and Arthur Funk. [3] [7032334] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [19-2714] [Edited 09/24/2019 by CG to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Teuscher, Julie) [Entered: 09/24/2019 01:22 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Edward R. Smith leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 09/17/2019. [2] [7031111] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 10/18/2019. [19-2714] (DSL) [Entered: 09/18/2019 11:20 AM] |
Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet filed.. [1] [7028511] [19-2714] (AP) [Entered: 09/06/2019 11:33 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.