Michael Mejia v. Randy Pfister, et al
| GUY PIERCE, SCOTT PUNKE and RANDY PFISTER |
| MICHAEL MEJIA |
| 19-2720 |
| September 6, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Prose motion filed by Appellant Michael Mejia to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Trust account statement included. [5] [7038511] [19-2720] (CG) [Entered: 10/22/2019 03:30 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Michael Mejia Memorandum In Support of PLRA Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis. [4] [7038509] [19-2720] (CG) [Entered: 10/22/2019 03:29 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Michael Mejia leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 09/20/2019. [3] [7031716] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 10/21/2019. [19-2720] (DSL) [Entered: 09/20/2019 02:57 PM] |
| Filing 2 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Michael Mejia. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [2] [7029114] [19-2720] (CMD) [Entered: 09/10/2019 09:23 AM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 10/07/2019. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Michael Mejia by 09/13/2019. Transcript information sheet due by 09/20/2019. [1] [7028596] [19-2720] (VG) [Entered: 09/06/2019 01:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
