Charles Keller v. J. Walton, et al
CHARLES D. KELLER |
CINDY BEHLE, SARAH BYRAM, JONATHAN MOWERY, J. S. WALTON, Warden/Superintendent of USP Marion and JON BYRAM |
19-2753 |
September 11, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER: On consideration of the Jurisdictional Memorandum filed by appellant on October 21, 2019, and the Response to Appellants Jurisdictional Memorandum filed by appellee on October 29, 2019, this appeal shall proceed to a determination of appellants fee status on appeal. Briefing in this appeal shall continue to be SUSPENDED until further court order. CMD [7041112] [19-2753] (CG) [Entered: 11/01/2019 03:19 PM] |
Filing 9 Filed Response by Appellees Cindy Behle, Jon Byram, Sarah Byram, Jonathan Mowery and J. S. Walton Attorney Adam E. Hanna to Jurisdictional Memorandum. [9][7040146] [19-2753] (Hanna, Adam) [Entered: 10/29/2019 04:38 PM] |
Filing 8 Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 14 day notice to file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or pay the docketing fee in the District Court. Fee or IFP forms due on 11/07/2019 for Appellant Charles D. Keller. [8] [7039018] [19-2753] (PS) [Entered: 10/24/2019 11:44 AM] |
Filing 7 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Charles D. Keller. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [7] [7038544] [19-2753] (AG) [Entered: 10/22/2019 04:37 PM] |
Filing 6 ORDER: Filed clerk's notice to Appellees Cindy Behle, Jon Byram, Sarah Byram, Jonathan Mowery and J. S. Walton to file a response to appellant's JURISDICTIONAL MEMORANDUM, addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the court's order of September 12, 2019. Response due for Appellees Cindy Behle, Jon Byram, Sarah Byram, Jonathan Mowery and J. S. Walton by October 29, 2019. DW [6] [7038372] [19-2753] (AD) [Entered: 10/22/2019 11:12 AM] |
Filing 5 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Charles D. Keller. [5] [7038195] [19-2753] (AG) [Entered: 10/21/2019 04:08 PM] |
Filing 4 ORDER: The court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff-appellant Charles D. Keller to show cause for his failure to respond to the courts order of September 12, 2019. Plaintiff-Appellant Keller shall file his response on or before October 17, 2019. Appellant is advised that failure to respond may result in the dismissal of this appeal. The clerk is directed to attach a copy of the courts order of September 12, 2019, to appellants copy of this order. DW Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7017 2680 0001 1550 0504. [4] [7034572] [19-2753] (AG) [Entered: 10/03/2019 04:14 PM] |
Filing 3 ORDER: Appellant Charles D. Keller is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Charles D. Keller by 10/10/2019. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7017 2680 0001 1549 5848. [3] [7032802] [19-2753] (AD) [Entered: 09/26/2019 10:06 AM] |
Filing 2 ORDER: Appellant Charles D. Keller shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) [7029990] DW Jurisdictional memorandum due for Appellant Charles D. Keller by 09/26/2019. [2] [7029990] [19-2753] (AG) [Entered: 09/12/2019 05:29 PM] |
Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Charles D. Keller by 09/18/2019. Transcript information sheet due by 09/25/2019. Fee or IFP forms due on 09/25/2019 for Appellant Charles D. Keller [1] [7029774] [19-2753] (CAG) [Entered: 09/12/2019 10:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.