William Rogers, Jr. v. Brian Foster
| WILLIAM D. ROGERS, JR. |
| BRIAN FOSTER, Warden |
| 19-2803 |
| September 18, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant William D. Rogers, Jr.. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [10] [7043249] [19-2803] (DRS) [Entered: 11/13/2019 08:46 AM] |
| Filing 9 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant William D. Rogers, Jr. leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 10/25/2019. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 11/27/2019 for Appellant William D. Rogers Jr. [7039772] [9] [7039772] [19-2803] (AP) [Entered: 10/28/2019 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 8 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant William D. Rogers, Jr.. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [8] [7039382] [19-2803] (AP) [Entered: 10/25/2019 02:30 PM] |
Filing 7
ORDER re: Letter, filed on 10/24/19. The appellant shall file the overdue Circuit Rule3(c) docketing statement by November 8, 2019. [ # 6 ] CMD [7] [7039182] [19-2803] (FP) [Entered: 10/24/2019 04:29 PM]
|
| Filing 6 Filed letter from Appellant William D. Rogers, Jr. regarding docketing statement. [6] [7039092] [19-2803] (PS) [Entered: 10/24/2019 02:26 PM] |
|
Filing 5
Order issued TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. JR [5] [7036976] [19-2803] (MM) [Entered: 10/16/2019 01:03 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Prose motion filed by Appellant William D. Rogers, Jr. to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [4] [7036974] [19-2803] (MM) [Entered: 10/16/2019 01:01 PM] |
| Filing 3 Pro se motion filed by Appellant William D. Rogers, Jr. for discretionary appointment of counsel. [3] [7036973] [19-2803] (MM) [Entered: 10/16/2019 12:59 PM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Appellant William D. Rogers, Jr. is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant William D. Rogers Jr. by 10/25/2019. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7017 2680 0001 1549 6098. [2] [7036268] [19-2803] (AD) [Entered: 10/11/2019 11:11 AM]
|
| Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 08/22/2019. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant William D. Rogers Jr. by 09/25/2019. Transcript information sheet due by 10/02/2019. Fee or IFP forms due on 10/02/2019 for Appellant William D. Rogers Jr.. [1] [7031351] [19-2803] (PS) [Entered: 09/19/2019 10:17 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: William Rogers, Jr. v. Brian Foster | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: WILLIAM D. ROGERS, JR. | |
| Represented By: | William D. Rogers Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: BRIAN FOSTER, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Aaron R. O'Neil |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
