Christopher Barbee v. USA
| CHRISTOPHER BARBEE |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 19-2836 |
| September 23, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Prose motion filed by Appellant Christopher Barbee to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [9] [7042710] [19-2836] (JR) [Entered: 11/08/2019 02:46 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Christopher Barbee leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis as MOOT. Date IFP denied: 11/08/2019. [8] [7042676] [19-2836] (VG) [Entered: 11/08/2019 01:54 PM] |
| Filing 7 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [7] [7042604] [19-2836] (VG) [Entered: 11/08/2019 11:24 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Christopher Barbee leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 10/15/2019. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 11/14/2019 for Appellant Christopher Barbee. [7036515] [6] [7036515] [19-2836] (VG) [Entered: 10/15/2019 11:01 AM] |
| Filing 5 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Christopher Barbee. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [5] [7036411] [19-2836] (ER) [Entered: 10/11/2019 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 4 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [4] [7035912] [19-2836] (VG) [Entered: 10/10/2019 09:06 AM] |
| Filing 3 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Christopher Barbee for certificate of appealability. [3] [7034871] [19-2836] (FP) [Entered: 10/04/2019 03:26 PM] |
Filing 2
ORDER: Appellant Christopher Barbee is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Christopher Barbee by 10/18/2019. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7017 2680 0001 1549 5961. [2] [7034662] [19-2836] (AD) [Entered: 10/04/2019 09:58 AM]
|
| Terminated Attorney Derek Owens and added Attorney Madeleine S. Murphy for Appellee USA in case 19-2836, pursuant to email notification from the Office of the U.S. Attorney regarding counsel of record. [7032349-2] [7032349] [19-2836] (JR) [Entered: 09/24/2019 01:59 PM] |
| Filing 1 Federal prisoner's 2255 case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 09/05/2019. Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 10/07/2019. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Christopher Barbee by 09/26/2019. Fee or IFP forms due on 10/07/2019 for Appellant Christopher Barbee. [1] [7032336] [19-2836] (FP) [Entered: 09/24/2019 01:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Christopher Barbee v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: CHRISTOPHER BARBEE | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Barbee |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Madeleine S. Murphy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
