Milton Leblanc v. Mr. Bults, Inc.
MILTON LEBLANC and MILTON J. LEBLANC |
MR. BULTS, INC., doing business as MBI |
19-2850 |
September 25, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER: re: Motion for voluntary dismissal of cross-appeal by Mr. Bult's Inc.,This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to F.R.A.P. 42(b). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [ # 3 ][4][7035778] [19-2850] (CG) [Entered: 10/09/2019 02:25 PM] |
FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 10/09/2019 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7035786-2] [7035786] [19-2850] (CG) [Entered: 10/09/2019 02:42 PM] |
Filing 3 Motion filed by Appellant Mr. Bults, Inc. in 19-2850 to dismiss case. [3] [7035561] [19-2850, 19-2751] (Temple, James) [Entered: 10/08/2019 05:03 PM] |
Filing 2 ORDER: Defendant-appellant Mr. Bults Inc. shall file, on or before 10/08/2019, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details). DW [7032946] [2] [7032946] [19-2850] (MM) [Entered: 09/26/2019 03:19 PM] |
Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Transcript information sheet due by 10/09/2019. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Mr. Bults, Inc. by 10/01/2019. Appellant's brief due on or before 11/04/2019 for Mr. Bults, Inc. [1] [7032669] [19-2850] (AD) [Entered: 09/25/2019 03:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.