Reginald Shanklin v. James Dimas, et al
| PAULA LODGE, LIBERTY HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, JAMES T. DIMAS, SHAN JUMPER and AMBER JELINEK |
| REGINALD B. SHANKLIN |
| 19-2980 |
| October 9, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [6][7058098] [19-2980] (PS) [Entered: 01/23/2020 02:57 PM]
|
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 01/23/2020 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7058116-2] [7058116] [19-2980] (PS) [Entered: 01/23/2020 03:16 PM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER issued DENYING motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [ # 4 ] The appellant has not made a potentially meritorious argument that the district court erred in entering summary judgment. Appellant shall pay the required docketing fee within 14 days, or else this appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7017 2680 0001 1549 6951. EBG [5] [7052198] [19-2980] (AD) [Entered: 12/26/2019 11:36 AM]
|
| Filing 4 Prose motion filed by Appellant Reginald B. Shanklin to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [4] [7038298] [19-2980] (MM) [Entered: 10/22/2019 08:51 AM] |
| Filing 3 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Craig L. Unrath for Appellees Amber Jelinek, Shan Jumper, Liberty Healthcare Corporation and Paula Lodge. [3] [7037943] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [19-2980]--[Edited 10/21/2019 by PS - to reflect the termination and addition of counsel.] (Unrath, Craig) [Entered: 10/21/2019 08:39 AM] |
|
Filing 2
Order issued A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). [7036019] DW [2] [7036019] [19-2980] (AD) [Entered: 10/10/2019 12:37 PM]
|
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP on appeal denied on 10/09/2019. Fee due. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 10/23/2019. Fee or IFP forms due on 10/23/2019 for Appellant Reginald B. Shanklin [1] [7035682] [19-2980] (VG) [Entered: 10/09/2019 12:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
